The cancellation policy page showed only the tenant policy, so nothing said
which services opt out of it. Service policies do not blend with the tenant one
— a service that has its own follows it completely — and without the table an
operator cannot tell why one service's penalty differs. It lists them with a
link to each service.
The waitlist had the matches endpoint and no way to reach it. The list answers
"who is waiting"; the question asked when capacity frees up is "who is waiting
for this slot", so the page now takes a service and a date and answers that.
The note says plainly that cancelling notifies them anyway — this is for
looking before deciding, not a second notification path.
Spacing is enforced at hold time rather than during candidate generation, which
costs one slot being shown and then refused, and saves a patient-history query
per candidate. That trade had no test; now a booking five days after the last
one is refused and one thirty days later goes through.
Checklists across all sixteen tasks are final: no pending rows, and the
warnings that remain are recorded decisions — one resolver instead of six
engines, a closed list instead of a registry, sample size three instead of ten
— each with the reason it was taken.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Task 09 left this as its starred risk and deferred it to task 10, which then
shipped without it. The failure mode is silent and expensive: an operator
writes a rule on a field no call site puts in the context, activates it, and it
never matches — no error, no log, and the clinic believes the rule is running.
The test is structural rather than behavioural on purpose. Walking every real
path for every field would need a test rig larger than the engine; asserting
that each advertised field is populated somewhere in src/ catches the case that
actually happens, which is a field added to the schema and nowhere else.
Also closes the last few rows that had gone stale:
- evaluateIsolated: PolicyResolver::evaluateOne() landed with the sandbox
- forbid before candidate generation: the plan builder already reads
prohibitions before the availability engine is reached
- appointments.applied_policies and app:policy:seed-examples are declined with
their reasons rather than left open — the trace lives on the price snapshot
and a second column would be a second source of truth, and the template
registry does the seeding job from inside the UI where the user can see the
result before creating anything
- the reserve list keeps its page in the URL like every other panel list
Every checklist across the sixteen tasks now has zero pending rows.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rows closed by the resource-strategy and blocking work: task 06's picker
interface and four strategies, task 07's ad-hoc blocking and 409 recovery, and
task 12's same-as-previous preference, which had been blocked on task 06's
missing strategies since it was written.
Tasks 13 and 14 both carried the flaky-suite caveat against their final review;
that flake has a diagnosed cause and a fix, so both now say so instead.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The engine from tasks 06 and 07 could find slots and hold them, but nothing in
the panel could actually book one.
- Search, hold, confirm stay three separate steps because they are three
separate states: between seeing a slot and taking it the seat is still open,
and between taking and confirming there is a deadline
- HoldCountdown reads the server's expires_at rather than starting its own
timer at render: browser clock skew and network latency both cost seconds,
and those seconds are exactly where a hold is lost. It turns urgent under a
minute and tells the parent the moment it lapses
- Per-role resource swap offers only the resources the engine returned for that
same slot. Listing every resource in the branch would let an operator pick
one that was never free and collect a 409
- An empty result is not an error: the reason code renders as a sentence
saying what to change
- Confirm requires a doctor and stays disabled until one is chosen — the
endpoint rejects it anyway, and finding that out after the hold clock has
been running is the wrong time
Reached from the appointments page as a separate action rather than folded into
the existing form: its search comes from the intersection of resource
calendars, not from one doctor's slots, and merging the two would confuse both.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Task 06's engine could only be switched on through the API, and nothing
checked whether the environment was ready for it. Since the mode choice is
irreversible, picking it with no resources defined would lock a clinic into a
state where no appointment is ever computable.
Backend now refuses that: resource mode requires at least one active resource,
with a message that says what to define first. Same shape as the existing
service-mode guard, applied on both save paths.
The panel shows the same conditions as a ✓/✗ list before the choice is made,
each unmet one linking to where it gets fixed — a 422 after an irreversible
decision is the wrong place to learn about a prerequisite.
Also adds the search step (minimum 5 minutes) and extends the existing mode
cards to three rather than building a parallel component.
No strategy picker: task 06 never built the strategies, and an empty menu reads
worse than an absent one.
GET /api/v1/service-items now returns has_segments, computed with one aggregate
query for the whole list rather than one per service.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Section 10 of the design document, and the payoff for tasks 01–05. The engine slides
a multi-segment plan across resource calendars and answers which times are actually
possible, with a suggested resource for each role. Until now the only conflict the
system checked was the doctor's; rooms, devices and operators did not exist.
Allocation is per *role*, not per segment, and that is what returns the wasted
capacity. An operator with no requirement during "waiting for the cream" is simply
not examined for those minutes, so another patient can use them. The reference test
encodes exactly that: patient A holds 10:00–11:00 while the operator is only busy
10:00–10:05 and 10:35–11:00, and patient B is offered a slot inside the gap with the
second room assigned. The spec says the task is not verified without that scenario.
One resource is chosen for every segment that needs its role, not independently per
segment — otherwise the operator in segment 1 and segment 3 could be two different
people and the patient would change hands mid-treatment.
Occupancy is stored one row per (segment × resource) rather than one per appointment.
The granularity is the whole point; a row per appointment would re-create the
single-interval model the design rejects. Reserved intervals are widened by each
resource's setup/cleanup, because the resource genuinely is not available then.
booking_mode gains a third value, resource, alongside slot and service. It is purely
additive: the default stays slot, no environment moves on its own, and a location
that has not opted in keeps the untouched legacy path. The frozen slot-mode contract
stays green.
Performance is a test, not a hope: 30 days, 20 resources and 500 existing bookings
complete well inside the 500ms budget. Every input is read once and the rest is in
memory — no query inside the day or candidate loop — and candidates are generated
only from the free windows of the scarcest role, which turns tens of thousands of
candidates into a few hundred.
An empty result is not an error and not a 404: it carries
reason: "no_capacity_in_range" so the caller does not have to infer meaning from
emptiness.
Also fixed a genuinely intermittent test defect: NumericFieldNormalizerTest padded a
random number with the three-byte Persian "۰" using byte-based str_pad, producing
broken UTF-8 whenever the number was short. It failed roughly at random. The improved
assertion message added earlier is what identified it immediately.
1196 tests / 3414 assertions. phpstan at its 14-error baseline.
Resource-picking strategies, the availability cache and the settings UI are recorded
as outstanding in the checklist with reasons — the cache in particular would be
premature while the performance test passes comfortably without it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Created checklist for task 11: Package and Credit Ledger
- Created checklist for task 12: Treatment Course
- Created checklist for task 13: Cancellation Policy, No-Show, and Waitlist
- Created checklist for task 14: Domain Events and Utilization Reports
- Add implementation notes for cancellation and waitlist features.
- Create task documentation outlining goals, current status, and acceptance criteria for cancellation policy and resource utilization reporting.
- Establish architecture for domain events and outbox pattern to ensure reliable event publishing.
- Define database schema for domain events and necessary queries for resource utilization and plan accuracy reports.
- Implement detailed implementation notes covering edge cases, testing strategies, and documentation requirements.
