The operator opens the session, treats each body area on its own device and
records what that device was set to. Readings are validated against the resource
type's field schema, so a laser form and an RF form each enforce their own rules
without this code naming either.
Finishing is allowed with areas still open — the operator is standing in front of
a patient and must not be trapped by the software — but the count comes back so
the panel can warn. Session state mirrors onto the appointment (salon, then
completed) while its slot times are never rewritten: those are the reservation's
promise and the input to occupancy, whereas how long it actually took belongs to
the session. Overwriting them would destroy the comparison between the two.
Who performed it is recorded on the session rather than inferred from the
appointment's planned staff: when a colleague covers a sick operator, the medical
record must say who actually held the device.
Endpoints live under /api/v1/dashboard/staff because StaffRouteGuardSubscriber
closes everything else to staff-only users. Opening a second door through its
allowlist would put the access boundary in two places.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Everything that differs between specialties as data is already stored as data.
What is left is behaviour — when a case opens, what happens once a session ends —
so it becomes a TreatmentWorkflow resolved through a tagged-service registry.
The booking path calls one collaborator and never names a specialty; adding
dentistry is a new class, not an edit to confirmation.
A clinic that has chosen no practice domain still gets working multi-session
courses: DefaultTreatmentWorkflow answers for null and for any code without a
dedicated implementation, keeping "unset means behave as today, not error".
LaserTreatmentWorkflow is deliberately empty beyond claiming `beauty` — it is the
seam where laser-specific behaviour will land without disturbing anyone else.
Session due dates are anchored to the previous session's actual finish, so a
patient who comes twenty days late shifts the rest of their course instead of
getting the next session while it can still do nothing. Only the next session is
recomputed; later ones keep their estimate because they are anchored to nothing
yet.
Attachment targets the first session without an appointment rather than the
first open one: a patient booking again mid-course was otherwise matched to the
session that already had a booking, and the second appointment went nowhere.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A protocol says a course of a service runs over several sessions, when each
falls due, which doctor supervises it and which staff may perform it. The row
existing IS the "طول درمان" switch, so there is no separate boolean that could
disagree with the step list.
Each step's offset is measured from the previous session rather than from the
start of the course: laser spacing is a clinical requirement — hair regrows
relative to the last treatment — so a late patient shifts the rest of their
course instead of getting the next session early. That also lets one course use
uneven gaps, which a single min/ideal/max triple cannot express: a botox course
is session 1, then +15 days, then monthly.
Steps and staff are cleared and rewritten in two flushes inside a transaction.
A single flush sends inserts before deletes and the replacement row collides
with the unique (protocol, step_number) index — caught by the replace test.
Removes docs/api/course.md and the task-12 folder. They documented src/Course/,
a module deleted in 65d5831c whose commit message only mentions removing two
test files; that design is superseded by this one.
ServiceItem::$sessionCount is marked deprecated. It never had logic behind it
and session count now comes from the protocol; the column stays in payloads so
existing clients keep working.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
