Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
hamedandClaude Opus 5 a8020e3c20 docs: reconcile checklists with what the last passes actually built
Rows closed by the resource-strategy and blocking work: task 06's picker
interface and four strategies, task 07's ad-hoc blocking and 409 recovery, and
task 12's same-as-previous preference, which had been blocked on task 06's
missing strategies since it was written.

Tasks 13 and 14 both carried the flaky-suite caveat against their final review;
that flake has a diagnosed cause and a fix, so both now say so instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 20:53:02 +03:30
hamedandClaude Opus 5 0074162bb1 feat(admin): resource-mode booking flow with a hold countdown
The engine from tasks 06 and 07 could find slots and hold them, but nothing in
the panel could actually book one.

- Search, hold, confirm stay three separate steps because they are three
  separate states: between seeing a slot and taking it the seat is still open,
  and between taking and confirming there is a deadline
- HoldCountdown reads the server's expires_at rather than starting its own
  timer at render: browser clock skew and network latency both cost seconds,
  and those seconds are exactly where a hold is lost. It turns urgent under a
  minute and tells the parent the moment it lapses
- Per-role resource swap offers only the resources the engine returned for that
  same slot. Listing every resource in the branch would let an operator pick
  one that was never free and collect a 409
- An empty result is not an error: the reason code renders as a sentence
  saying what to change
- Confirm requires a doctor and stays disabled until one is chosen — the
  endpoint rejects it anyway, and finding that out after the hold clock has
  been running is the wrong time

Reached from the appointments page as a separate action rather than folded into
the existing form: its search comes from the intersection of resource
calendars, not from one doctor's slots, and merging the two would confuse both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 20:05:12 +03:30
hamedandClaude Opus 5 d56c41c87e feat(admin): resource booking mode with a readiness guard
Task 06's engine could only be switched on through the API, and nothing
checked whether the environment was ready for it. Since the mode choice is
irreversible, picking it with no resources defined would lock a clinic into a
state where no appointment is ever computable.

Backend now refuses that: resource mode requires at least one active resource,
with a message that says what to define first. Same shape as the existing
service-mode guard, applied on both save paths.

The panel shows the same conditions as a ✓/✗ list before the choice is made,
each unmet one linking to where it gets fixed — a 422 after an irreversible
decision is the wrong place to learn about a prerequisite.

Also adds the search step (minimum 5 minutes) and extends the existing mode
cards to three rather than building a parallel component.

No strategy picker: task 06 never built the strategies, and an empty menu reads
worse than an absent one.

GET /api/v1/service-items now returns has_segments, computed with one aggregate
query for the whole list rather than one per service.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 19:51:29 +03:30
hamedandClaude Opus 5 24534ec483 feat(availability): multi-resource availability engine
Section 10 of the design document, and the payoff for tasks 01–05. The engine slides
a multi-segment plan across resource calendars and answers which times are actually
possible, with a suggested resource for each role. Until now the only conflict the
system checked was the doctor's; rooms, devices and operators did not exist.

Allocation is per *role*, not per segment, and that is what returns the wasted
capacity. An operator with no requirement during "waiting for the cream" is simply
not examined for those minutes, so another patient can use them. The reference test
encodes exactly that: patient A holds 10:00–11:00 while the operator is only busy
10:00–10:05 and 10:35–11:00, and patient B is offered a slot inside the gap with the
second room assigned. The spec says the task is not verified without that scenario.

One resource is chosen for every segment that needs its role, not independently per
segment — otherwise the operator in segment 1 and segment 3 could be two different
people and the patient would change hands mid-treatment.

Occupancy is stored one row per (segment × resource) rather than one per appointment.
The granularity is the whole point; a row per appointment would re-create the
single-interval model the design rejects. Reserved intervals are widened by each
resource's setup/cleanup, because the resource genuinely is not available then.

booking_mode gains a third value, resource, alongside slot and service. It is purely
additive: the default stays slot, no environment moves on its own, and a location
that has not opted in keeps the untouched legacy path. The frozen slot-mode contract
stays green.

Performance is a test, not a hope: 30 days, 20 resources and 500 existing bookings
complete well inside the 500ms budget. Every input is read once and the rest is in
memory — no query inside the day or candidate loop — and candidates are generated
only from the free windows of the scarcest role, which turns tens of thousands of
candidates into a few hundred.

An empty result is not an error and not a 404: it carries
reason: "no_capacity_in_range" so the caller does not have to infer meaning from
emptiness.

Also fixed a genuinely intermittent test defect: NumericFieldNormalizerTest padded a
random number with the three-byte Persian "۰" using byte-based str_pad, producing
broken UTF-8 whenever the number was short. It failed roughly at random. The improved
assertion message added earlier is what identified it immediately.

1196 tests / 3414 assertions. phpstan at its 14-error baseline.

Resource-picking strategies, the availability cache and the settings UI are recorded
as outstanding in the checklist with reasons — the cache in particular would be
premature while the performance test passes comfortably without it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 21:21:33 +03:30
hamed 70739691d1 Add checklists for tasks 11 to 14 covering credit ledger, treatment course, cancellation policies, and event utilization
- Created checklist for task 11: Package and Credit Ledger
- Created checklist for task 12: Treatment Course
- Created checklist for task 13: Cancellation Policy, No-Show, and Waitlist
- Created checklist for task 14: Domain Events and Utilization Reports
2026-07-30 12:12:45 +03:30