The no-show records existed and drove the risk tag, but the patient's file
never showed the number behind it — the operator saw a tag with no evidence.
GET /patient/{uuid}/no-shows returns the count, the policy threshold and the
window, and the banner shows it only when the count is above zero: "0 no-shows"
on every healthy patient's file is an accusation nobody made.
The badge does not block anything and the docs say so. Blocking is an
eligibility policy from task 09 built on the same tag; a clinic that wants to
see the risk but still take a deposit must not have to switch the count off.
A test pins that a tagged patient still books.
Both report pages kept their range and branch in local state, so going back
from a resource lost the report and a shared link opened someone else's
default. They use useUrlState now, like every other list in the panel.
Three tests that were owed:
- the service-level cancellation policy beats the tenant one with no blending,
checked through the number that comes out rather than through the resolver
- a patient over the no-show threshold can still book
- occupied includes the waiting segment while active does not — if those two
came back equal the whole utilization report would be pointless
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tasks 07 through 13 each changed something the rest of the system might want
to know about, with no contract for saying so. And task 05 shipped a powerful
segment editor with no feedback on whether a clinic defined its segments right.
Events
- A closed list of names, because a consumer branches on the string and a
one-letter typo would produce an event nobody hears and no error either
- Payloads carry uuids and scalars only; non-scalars are dropped, not
serialised, so a consumer always fetches fresh rather than reading a stale
detached entity
- record() deliberately does not flush: the event row commits with the change
it describes, so a rolled-back transaction leaves no event behind. A test
pins exactly that
- app:events:publish drains the outbox; five failed attempts park a row with
its error rather than deleting it, because a silently dropped event is a
loss with no trace. app:events:prune only ever removes published rows
Reports
- Resource utilisation separates available, occupied and active minutes.
The gap between occupied and active is what exposes a bad segment
definition, and available is multiplied by capacity so a three-chair room
does not read as permanently over 100%
- A resource with no calendar reports utilization: null, not zero — dividing
by zero means something different from being idle
- Plan accuracy compares planned against actual duration per service and
flags both directions: running short wastes capacity that could have been
sold. Its row links straight to editing that service's segments, because a
report with no route to a fix does not get read
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
