Starting a session created area records with no device, and the panel only ever
read the device it never set — so every "اتمام این ناحیه" came back 422 with
"دستگاه این ناحیه مشخص نیست". The backend tests passed because they sent
resource_uuid explicitly; from the UI the flow was unusable end to end.
The device now inherits from the appointment's resource, which the secretary
already chose at booking; asking the operator again is taking one decision
twice. The session screen offers a picker per area on top of that, because one
session really does run bikini on an alexandrite and underarms on a diode.
Treating without a device is allowed: botox is an injection, and requiring a
device would make clinics invent a fake resource per injection. Sending readings
with no device is still rejected — there would be no schema to validate against.
A protocol whose service has no ResourceServiceOffering rows now says so in the
tab where the manager is standing. It does not block booking: "no offering means
any resource" is a deliberate, tested rule. But silence meant the gap surfaced
only when the operator was already in front of a patient.
Also adds the live timer the spec asked for, and wires slot-suggestions into the
unbooked queue — the endpoint existed and tested green but no screen called it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The operator opens the session, treats each body area on its own device and
records what that device was set to. Readings are validated against the resource
type's field schema, so a laser form and an RF form each enforce their own rules
without this code naming either.
Finishing is allowed with areas still open — the operator is standing in front of
a patient and must not be trapped by the software — but the count comes back so
the panel can warn. Session state mirrors onto the appointment (salon, then
completed) while its slot times are never rewritten: those are the reservation's
promise and the input to occupancy, whereas how long it actually took belongs to
the session. Overwriting them would destroy the comparison between the two.
Who performed it is recorded on the session rather than inferred from the
appointment's planned staff: when a colleague covers a sick operator, the medical
record must say who actually held the device.
Endpoints live under /api/v1/dashboard/staff because StaffRouteGuardSubscriber
closes everything else to staff-only users. Opening a second door through its
allowlist would put the access boundary in two places.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
