POST /api/v1/appointment resolved the selected services, summed their minutes,
used that to compute slot_end — and then dropped the result. It never called
replaceServiceItems() or setServiceDuration(), so an appointment booked from
the public site kept no record of what it was booked for:
- the patient panel showed neither the service nor the duration
- reports counted the appointment as having no services
- a later reschedule had no duration to preserve
The management path did all of this correctly; only the public path did not.
Found by booking through the real endpoint and looking at the panel, which is
the one thing no test did.
The duration was also computed as a naive sum of duration_minutes, ignoring the
solo/additional split. That made a multi-service booking's length disagree with
the slots appointment-service-slots had just offered the patient — the booking
would occupy a different span than the one shown. Both paths now go through
ServiceBookingCalculator, which is what builds those slots.
For data that only sets duration_minutes, the calculator returns the same total
as the old sum, so existing services are unaffected.
assertServicesMatchContext() is gone: the calculator performs the identical
ownership check with the same error code and message, and the tenant-lookup
inventory is updated to match.
Tests: PublicBookingServicePersistenceTest starts at the endpoint rather than
building an appointment in memory — the gap that let this ship. Verified it
fails (4 of 8) with the fix disabled. Full suite 1433 green, slot-mode-frozen
green, phpstan at its 14-error baseline.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The product owner reverted the dark-mode work on nobat724_front, so six rows in
task-00b that either claimed dark mode was verified or listed it as debt no
longer describe reality. They are now marked out-of-scope with the date and the
reason, and the underlying finding is kept as a recorded fact rather than a
pending task.
Nine admin-panel dark-mode rows across tasks 00-14 are untouched: the admin
SPA's dark mode is a separate, working mechanism and was never part of the
revert.
Also closed nine panel visual-review rows with the screenshots taken this
session, and five public-site rows verified in a real browser.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The last structural gap from task 05 was the third occupancy mode. It is
passive: the resource is genuinely held — nobody else can take that room while
the patient waits for the anaesthetic — but the time is not work done. It
blocks exactly like exclusive; the difference is in the report, where without
it a room that spends half its day waiting reads as fully utilised. The mode is
validated, offered in the segment editor and carried through to the plan.
Everything else that was still marked as a deviation is now recorded in
docs/architecture/deviations.md, one row each, in the form "what the plan said
/ what was built / why". That includes the ones I would defend (five plan
services collapsed into one builder that only build() calls; a Skill foreign
key instead of a JSON array, because a deleted skill in JSON fails silently)
and the ones that are simply facts about the product (service_option does not
exist here, so a column for it would sit empty until someone read it as a bug).
The i18n section says plainly that the product is single-language and describes
the order to migrate in if that changes — a translation layer with one language
is an indirection, not an abstraction.
All sixteen checklists now read zero pending and zero unresolved.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The wiring is fixed and browser-verified, but components/appointment/ has no
dark: utilities at all, so the booking flow still renders identically in either
theme. That is design work, and the row says so rather than claiming done.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The cancellation policy page showed only the tenant policy, so nothing said
which services opt out of it. Service policies do not blend with the tenant one
— a service that has its own follows it completely — and without the table an
operator cannot tell why one service's penalty differs. It lists them with a
link to each service.
The waitlist had the matches endpoint and no way to reach it. The list answers
"who is waiting"; the question asked when capacity frees up is "who is waiting
for this slot", so the page now takes a service and a date and answers that.
The note says plainly that cancelling notifies them anyway — this is for
looking before deciding, not a second notification path.
Spacing is enforced at hold time rather than during candidate generation, which
costs one slot being shown and then refused, and saves a patient-history query
per candidate. That trade had no test; now a booking five days after the last
one is refused and one thirty days later goes through.
Checklists across all sixteen tasks are final: no pending rows, and the
warnings that remain are recorded decisions — one resolver instead of six
engines, a closed list instead of a registry, sample size three instead of ten
— each with the reason it was taken.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Task 09 left this as its starred risk and deferred it to task 10, which then
shipped without it. The failure mode is silent and expensive: an operator
writes a rule on a field no call site puts in the context, activates it, and it
never matches — no error, no log, and the clinic believes the rule is running.
The test is structural rather than behavioural on purpose. Walking every real
path for every field would need a test rig larger than the engine; asserting
that each advertised field is populated somewhere in src/ catches the case that
actually happens, which is a field added to the schema and nowhere else.
Also closes the last few rows that had gone stale:
- evaluateIsolated: PolicyResolver::evaluateOne() landed with the sandbox
- forbid before candidate generation: the plan builder already reads
prohibitions before the availability engine is reached
- appointments.applied_policies and app:policy:seed-examples are declined with
their reasons rather than left open — the trace lives on the price snapshot
and a second column would be a second source of truth, and the template
registry does the seeding job from inside the UI where the user can see the
result before creating anything
- the reserve list keeps its page in the URL like every other panel list
Every checklist across the sixteen tasks now has zero pending rows.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds PublicSiteAppointmentContractTest over GET /api/v1/appointments/user — the
endpoint the public site's user panel actually calls. Task 00's note claimed this
prerequisite was met by extending my/appointments, which is the admin panel's
endpoint; appointments/user returns Appointment::toArray(), which the same task
extended separately. The outcome was right, the reasoning in the note was not.
This test pins it so neither can drift silently: breaking these fields produces no
build error in either repo.
Documents why appointment-service-slots cannot be grouped into shifts by the
client, and records task 00b's checklist including the two items deliberately not
done (colour rewrite, reschedule button) with the evidence for each.
Task: docs/new_feture/taskes/task-00b-nobat724-service-mode/
Slot-mode contract: unchanged (--group=slot-mode-frozen green)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add task for completing service mode in clinicpro with detailed objectives and acceptance criteria.
- Create architecture documentation for task 00b, outlining involved components and necessary changes.
- Develop checklist for task 00b to ensure all requirements are met.
- Document implementation notes for task 00b, emphasizing API contract checks and design system adherence.
- Update task documentation for task 00b, specifying goals and current issues with service mode.
