000cf7076121bc82ccabcb4cca31d38517e9e19b
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
000cf70761 |
feat(resources): warn before switching a resource off, and pick dates in Jalali
The deactivation warning was blocked on task 07: there was no way to count "the
appointments on this resource" until occupancy rows linked the two. They do
now, so GET /resource/{uuid} returns upcoming_appointments. It stays off the
list endpoint, where it would be one count query per row.
It is a warning, not a block, and the wording says so: switching a resource off
does not cancel anything, it only removes the resource from future searches.
The panel shows it the moment the "active" box is unticked.
The calendar's exception range still used <input type="date">, which is
Gregorian. Operators say dates in Jalali, and the mental conversion is exactly
where an exception gets recorded a day off. PersianDateInput takes the same
YYYY-MM-DD string, so this is a drop-in swap.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
0127b463a6 |
feat(resource): ad-hoc blocking, 409 recovery, and the rest of the flake
Ad-hoc resource blocking - "The laser is being serviced this afternoon" is a specific range, not a change to the resource's working pattern. It stays separate from calendar exceptions and the modal says which is which — merging them means either an afternoon's closure lives in the calendar forever, or a change to working hours vanishes with one click - Blocking a range that already holds an appointment is refused with 409 rather than silently taking capacity back; the appointment is still there and someone has to decide about it first - Deleting an occupancy that belongs to an appointment is refused too, otherwise a patient's booking would quietly lose its resource with no record 409 on hold now recovers Saying "someone just took it" is not enough — the operator would have to search again by hand. The page drops the stale selection and refetches, so alternatives are on screen immediately. Flake, second half The earlier fix only covered createUser's retry path. Any test that trips a unique constraint closes the EntityManager, and the next test inherits the same closed instance from the container. setUp now resets the registry when it finds a closed manager, so a test's starting state no longer depends on how the previous one failed. Three consecutive full runs green: 1340 tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
4395eea56e |
feat(booking): multi-resource holds and confirmation with a database-level guarantee
Section 11 and the third closing rule of the design document: preventing a double booking is the database's job, not the code's. Any "is it free?" check in PHP has a race window between the read and the write — two concurrent requests both see free and both write. MariaDB has no range EXCLUDE constraint, so every occupied interval is broken into fixed five-minute buckets under UNIQUE(resource_id, bucket_at, seat). The code only INSERTs; a rejection from the database *is* the answer. `seat` carries capacity: a three-bed room has seats 0..2, allocation walks upward on each collision, and the fourth concurrent hold finds nowhere to sit. Counting capacity in PHP would have rebuilt the very race this removes. Buckets are written through DBAL rather than the ORM on purpose: a unique violation raised inside flush() closes the EntityManager, and the next seat attempt would then fail with "EntityManager is closed", hiding the real outcome. Occupancy is one row per (segment × resource). The reference test asserts the payoff directly: for a 55-minute appointment of numbing / waiting / laser, the room gets three rows and the operator only two — the operator holds nothing during the wait and stays bookable for someone else. A partial hold never survives. If the second resource has no room, the first is released and the hold itself removed; otherwise a resource stays locked for an appointment that will never exist. Confirming does not re-reserve anything — the seats were taken at hold time and only the label changes. Re-reserving on confirm would reopen the race the hold closed. Cancelling marks rows `released` instead of deleting them, because the history of which resource was busy when is the input to the utilisation reports; the uniqueness buckets *are* deleted, or that interval would stay locked forever. Expired holds are released by the existing scheduler rather than a new one. That exposed a bug in my own change: the flush guard used $count, which now includes released holds, so reset([]) could pass false to save(). It is guarded on $expired. The appointment itself is still built with the existing constructor, so active_slot_key, events and the payment path behave exactly as before — the multi-resource occupancy sits beside them, not instead of them. 12 tests. Two matter most: the second hold on the same resource and interval getting 409, and a test that writes a duplicate bucket row over a *separate connection* and expects the unique-key violation — if that one ever passes silently, the guarantee had moved back into the code. 1208 tests / 3495 assertions. phpstan at its 14-error baseline. Frozen slot contract green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
24534ec483 |
feat(availability): multi-resource availability engine
Section 10 of the design document, and the payoff for tasks 01–05. The engine slides a multi-segment plan across resource calendars and answers which times are actually possible, with a suggested resource for each role. Until now the only conflict the system checked was the doctor's; rooms, devices and operators did not exist. Allocation is per *role*, not per segment, and that is what returns the wasted capacity. An operator with no requirement during "waiting for the cream" is simply not examined for those minutes, so another patient can use them. The reference test encodes exactly that: patient A holds 10:00–11:00 while the operator is only busy 10:00–10:05 and 10:35–11:00, and patient B is offered a slot inside the gap with the second room assigned. The spec says the task is not verified without that scenario. One resource is chosen for every segment that needs its role, not independently per segment — otherwise the operator in segment 1 and segment 3 could be two different people and the patient would change hands mid-treatment. Occupancy is stored one row per (segment × resource) rather than one per appointment. The granularity is the whole point; a row per appointment would re-create the single-interval model the design rejects. Reserved intervals are widened by each resource's setup/cleanup, because the resource genuinely is not available then. booking_mode gains a third value, resource, alongside slot and service. It is purely additive: the default stays slot, no environment moves on its own, and a location that has not opted in keeps the untouched legacy path. The frozen slot-mode contract stays green. Performance is a test, not a hope: 30 days, 20 resources and 500 existing bookings complete well inside the 500ms budget. Every input is read once and the rest is in memory — no query inside the day or candidate loop — and candidates are generated only from the free windows of the scarcest role, which turns tens of thousands of candidates into a few hundred. An empty result is not an error and not a 404: it carries reason: "no_capacity_in_range" so the caller does not have to infer meaning from emptiness. Also fixed a genuinely intermittent test defect: NumericFieldNormalizerTest padded a random number with the three-byte Persian "۰" using byte-based str_pad, producing broken UTF-8 whenever the number was short. It failed roughly at random. The improved assertion message added earlier is what identified it immediately. 1196 tests / 3414 assertions. phpstan at its 14-error baseline. Resource-picking strategies, the availability cache and the settings UI are recorded as outstanding in the checklist with reasons — the cache in particular would be premature while the performance test passes comfortably without it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |